Specialized anti-corruption Prosecutor’s office will not “blanch” the detectives NAB, if proven guilty in the illegal wiretapping . About it I wrote in Facebook the head of the Specialized anti-corruption prosecutors Nazar Golodnitsky.
“If the investigation reveals illegal actions regulated us Bureau detectives, SAP will not take any administrative measures or legal proceedings for “separating” guilty”, – said the Prosecutor General.
The head of the Specialized anti-corruption Prosecutor’s office said that all evidence relating to the illegal interception must be carefully checked.
“In the four months it was possible to investigate thoroughly all the circumstances of this production( of illegal wiretapping, – ed.), and not to organize such an event, which reduces very low public confidence in law enforcement,” added Holodnitsky.
August 5, the NAB reported the attempted carrying out a search in the building of the NABOO arrived by investigators of the Prosecutor General.
Prosecutor General Yury Lutsenko reported that the investigation received the required documents, after a final analysis of which will be the conclusion which employees of any law enforcement Agency, the SBU, or the NEB, is relevant to illegal wiretapping. Lutsenko said that it is about illegal wiretapping of citizen that is not involved in the investigation and official.
NABU said that the Prosecutor General’s office indicated as the search warrant to the National anti-corruption Bureau court ruling in connection with a criminal investigation into the alleged illegal wiretapping by employees of the NABU calls.
We are talking about listening of telephone conversations of defendants in criminal proceedings on the fact of theft of sugar from the warehouses of budget institutions, the Agrarian Fund in Cherkasy region worth more than 300 million UAH. The main suspect in this case is the Deputy Prosecutor of Kyiv region Oleksandr Kolesnik, who was arrested by detectives NAB may 18, 2016 and taken into custody on suspicion of abuse of power.
The National anti-corruption Bureau also argued that the search of the building Bureau was conducted in accordance with the illegal decision of Pechersky court.